// Case study
AWS cost optimization, 38% spend reduction without performance loss
Reserved instances, Graviton migration, and S3 lifecycle policies right-sized a Series A data platform bill.
A Series A data analytics platform at $42k monthly AWS spend faced runway pressure. Engineering feared optimisation meant throttling queries; finance needed measurable savings inside one quarter without performance regression.
$42k → $26k
Monthly AWS spend
−38% reduction
Within 3%
Query p95
Unchanged post-Graviton migration
34%
On-demand EC2 share
Baseline before reserved capacity
1 quarter
Savings timeline
Finance runway target met
Delivered by Deepak Pathak · Published April 12, 2025 · Updated June 17, 2026 · 10 min read
Client context
A Series A data analytics platform, $42k monthly AWS, faced runway pressure. Engineering feared optimization meant throttling queries. Finance wanted savings inside one quarter without degrading customer-facing SLAs.
The challenge
Assessment: 34% on-demand EC2 with flat utilization; oversized RDS instance class; CloudWatch log retention infinite; cross-AZ data transfer unmonitored; dev/staging running 24/7 at production scale; unused EBS snapshots from decommissioned experiments.
Problems: one legacy Java dependency blocked Graviton on two nodes, kept m5 reserved pair; CFO wanted showback per team, Cost Allocation Tags enforced via SCP with monthly FinOps PDF; engineering feared query regression, we held p95 within 3% margin throughout.
Our approach
Actions: Compute Optimizer and Cost Explorer rightsizing review; one-year reserved capacity for baseline workers; m5 → m7g Graviton on stateless workers after ARM compatibility test suite; S3 Intelligent-Tiering on analytics exports; log retention 30 days with export to S3 Glacier for compliance; Instance Scheduler on non-prod with IST business-hours profile.
Delivery notes
Technical implementation: Terraform modules for reservations and schedules; team showback tags enforced via SCP; Graviton migration required JVM heap tuning on two legacy workers; query p95 monitored in Datadog before/after each change.
Technical implementation
Governance: monthly cost review with engineering leads; anomaly detection on daily spend; no production changes during month-end billing batch window.
Results & impact
Outcome: monthly bill $42k → $26k (-38%); query p95 unchanged within 3% margin. Platform anonymized, analytics SaaS, delivered from Bangalore with executive readout to founders.
// Related services
CIN
AAU-8582
Startup India
DIPP83124
Founded
November 2020
Office
Residency Rd, Bengaluru, India
Ready to scope your next initiative?
Share your goals with our Bangalore team. We respond within one business day with a clear path from discovery to delivery.
